<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 590 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180166</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the penalty of Rs. 50,000 imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The revised return filed by the assessee was deemed invalid, and the assessee&#039;s failure to provide evidence for the revised expenses led to the confirmation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:24:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 590 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180166</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the penalty of Rs. 50,000 imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The revised return filed by the assessee was deemed invalid, and the assessee&#039;s failure to provide evidence for the revised expenses led to the confirmation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>