<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 584 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325400</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decisions on all issues. The expenditure on repairs and maintenance was considered revenue in nature, the amortization of share issue expenses was allowed up to Rs. 15,000, and the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS was reversed due to timely payments. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:11:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 584 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325400</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decisions on all issues. The expenditure on repairs and maintenance was considered revenue in nature, the amortization of share issue expenses was allowed up to Rs. 15,000, and the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS was reversed due to timely payments. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>