<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 77 - HIGH COURT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2697</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed both writ appeals, setting aside the single Judge&#039;s order and directing the refund of the balance amount to the writ petitioner with interest. The court emphasized the importance of complying with legal procedures and addressing issues of notice delivery and communication effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 77 - HIGH COURT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2697</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed both writ appeals, setting aside the single Judge&#039;s order and directing the refund of the balance amount to the writ petitioner with interest. The court emphasized the importance of complying with legal procedures and addressing issues of notice delivery and communication effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>