<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 567 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325383</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of the appellants, an Export Oriented Unit (EOU), in a case concerning duty liability on damaged fabrics cleared for export but brought back to the factory. The tribunal found that the appellants had successfully reprocessed the damaged fabrics for export and Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) clearance, complying with duty payment requirements. The tribunal compared the case with relevant precedents and concluded that the appellants were entitled to duty remission and exemption, setting aside the duty demand raised by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 567 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325383</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of the appellants, an Export Oriented Unit (EOU), in a case concerning duty liability on damaged fabrics cleared for export but brought back to the factory. The tribunal found that the appellants had successfully reprocessed the damaged fabrics for export and Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) clearance, complying with duty payment requirements. The tribunal compared the case with relevant precedents and concluded that the appellants were entitled to duty remission and exemption, setting aside the duty demand raised by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>