<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 557 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325373</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the jurisdiction of Mumbai DGCEI officers to issue a show cause notice for customs duty evasion involving imported goods transshipped to Surat. Penalties were imposed under Sections 112 and 114A of the Customs Act, 1962, on individuals involved in the diversion of duty-free goods into the local market. The mastermind was fined Rs. 20 lakhs, while others received penalties ranging from Rs. 1-3 lakhs. The appellants&#039; roles in the evasion scheme were upheld, leading to upheld or reduced penalties based on individual involvement. Appeals by some appellants were rejected, while others saw their penalties reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:04:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 557 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325373</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the jurisdiction of Mumbai DGCEI officers to issue a show cause notice for customs duty evasion involving imported goods transshipped to Surat. Penalties were imposed under Sections 112 and 114A of the Customs Act, 1962, on individuals involved in the diversion of duty-free goods into the local market. The mastermind was fined Rs. 20 lakhs, while others received penalties ranging from Rs. 1-3 lakhs. The appellants&#039; roles in the evasion scheme were upheld, leading to upheld or reduced penalties based on individual involvement. Appeals by some appellants were rejected, while others saw their penalties reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>