https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2695 Bail under the NDPS Act requires the Court to be satisfied, on the material collected, that the accused is not guilty and will not commit an offence while on bail. On the facts recorded, the Court found strong inculpatory material showing involvement in the prohibited trade and refused bail. The Court also held that Section 79 of the Information Technology Act protects only qualifying intermediaries from liability under that Act, and does not shield companies whose websites were used to facilitate online pharmacies and distribution of psychotropic substances. The immunity plea was therefore rejected. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2695 Bail under the NDPS Act requires the Court to be satisfied, on the material collected, that the accused is not guilty and will not commit an offence while on bail. On the facts recorded, the Court found strong inculpatory material showing involvement in the prohibited trade and refused bail. The Court also held that Section 79 of the Information Technology Act protects only qualifying intermediaries from liability under that Act, and does not shield companies whose websites were used to facilitate online pharmacies and distribution of psychotropic substances. The immunity plea was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2695