<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (7) TMI 42 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180156</link>
    <description>Closing stock must be valued at cost or market value, whichever is lower. Where the evidence showed no local or foreign market for the unsold snake skins and the stock had become unsaleable during the accounting year, the market value was effectively nil. The assessee was therefore entitled to adopt nil valuation for the closing stock, and any later sale would be taxed in the subsequent year when realised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:45:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (7) TMI 42 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180156</link>
      <description>Closing stock must be valued at cost or market value, whichever is lower. Where the evidence showed no local or foreign market for the unsold snake skins and the stock had become unsaleable during the accounting year, the market value was effectively nil. The assessee was therefore entitled to adopt nil valuation for the closing stock, and any later sale would be taxed in the subsequent year when realised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>