<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 500 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180142</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 35,50,000 under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The tribunal concluded that the provisions were inapplicable as the individual in question did not meet the 20% shareholding threshold, thus not holding substantial interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 500 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180142</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 35,50,000 under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The tribunal concluded that the provisions were inapplicable as the individual in question did not meet the 20% shareholding threshold, thus not holding substantial interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>