<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 643 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180131</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction may be attracted where a material part of the cause of action arises within the State, including the petitioner&#039;s manufacturing activity and use of the subject goods in Rajasthan. In anti-dumping proceedings, however, a writ petition against an initiation notification is ordinarily not maintainable because the notification is treated as an step akin to a show cause notice, and the affected party can raise objections in the statutory investigation. On that approach, the writ was treated as premature despite jurisdiction being available on the facts, and the interim order was vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:02:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 643 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180131</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction may be attracted where a material part of the cause of action arises within the State, including the petitioner&#039;s manufacturing activity and use of the subject goods in Rajasthan. In anti-dumping proceedings, however, a writ petition against an initiation notification is ordinarily not maintainable because the notification is treated as an step akin to a show cause notice, and the affected party can raise objections in the statutory investigation. On that approach, the writ was treated as premature despite jurisdiction being available on the facts, and the interim order was vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>