https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180131 The court dismissed the writ petition as premature, ruling it was not maintainable against the initiation notification, akin to a show cause notice. The court did not address the merits of arguments on Designated Authority's jurisdiction and Rule 5 compliance. The interim order was vacated. The court found territorial jurisdiction based on the petitioner's factory location in Rajasthan. The petition was deemed premature, following precedents that such challenges should occur post-investigation participation. en-us Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:02:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180131 The court dismissed the writ petition as premature, ruling it was not maintainable against the initiation notification, akin to a show cause notice. The court did not address the merits of arguments on Designated Authority's jurisdiction and Rule 5 compliance. The interim order was vacated. The court found territorial jurisdiction based on the petitioner's factory location in Rajasthan. The petition was deemed premature, following precedents that such challenges should occur post-investigation participation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180131