<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1147 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180130</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the order confirming interest charged under section 234B for tax payable due to a retrospective amendment. It held that the law applicable at the time of advance tax payment should determine the default, not retrospective amendments, citing a decision of the Hon&#039;ble Calcutta High Court. The Tribunal emphasized that amended provisions cannot penalize an assessee for non-payment of advance tax due to retrospective changes in the law, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:19:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1147 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180130</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the order confirming interest charged under section 234B for tax payable due to a retrospective amendment. It held that the law applicable at the time of advance tax payment should determine the default, not retrospective amendments, citing a decision of the Hon&#039;ble Calcutta High Court. The Tribunal emphasized that amended provisions cannot penalize an assessee for non-payment of advance tax due to retrospective changes in the law, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>