<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1004 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180119</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowances of CENVAT Credit totaling &amp;amp;8377; 10,67,348/- and &amp;amp;8377; 1,81,290/-, directing the refund of the contested amounts. It emphasized the necessity of maintaining nexus between input and output services for claiming credit and upheld the appellant&#039;s right to redistribute credit between its offices based on valid agreements and centralized operations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1004 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180119</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowances of CENVAT Credit totaling &amp;amp;8377; 10,67,348/- and &amp;amp;8377; 1,81,290/-, directing the refund of the contested amounts. It emphasized the necessity of maintaining nexus between input and output services for claiming credit and upheld the appellant&#039;s right to redistribute credit between its offices based on valid agreements and centralized operations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>