<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 537 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325353</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that penalties cannot be imposed on debatable issues and that the penalty was not justified in the absence of proven falsity in the explanation provided by the assessee. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) was set aside in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:12:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 537 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325353</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that penalties cannot be imposed on debatable issues and that the penalty was not justified in the absence of proven falsity in the explanation provided by the assessee. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) was set aside in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>