<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 534 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325350</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2001-02. The decision was based on legal precedents and a CBDT circular, determining that penalties were not applicable if the tax payable under normal provisions was lower than that under section 115JB. The Tribunal upheld the total income declared under section 115JB as the final income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:12:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 534 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325350</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2001-02. The decision was based on legal precedents and a CBDT circular, determining that penalties were not applicable if the tax payable under normal provisions was lower than that under section 115JB. The Tribunal upheld the total income declared under section 115JB as the final income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>