<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 524 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325340</link>
    <description>The case involved a challenge by M/s Dewsoft Overseas Pvt Ltd against a tax demand for providing commercial training or coaching services. The liability was upheld based on statutory provisions specifying taxability. The appellant&#039;s argument of being an educational institution using online methods was rejected, emphasizing that online education falls under commercial training. The judgment clarified the taxable activity of commercial training centers and dismissed the appeal, stating that statutory provisions do not differentiate between educational institutions and training centers for tax purposes. The analysis highlighted the legislative authority to define taxable activities, regardless of institutional titles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 524 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325340</link>
      <description>The case involved a challenge by M/s Dewsoft Overseas Pvt Ltd against a tax demand for providing commercial training or coaching services. The liability was upheld based on statutory provisions specifying taxability. The appellant&#039;s argument of being an educational institution using online methods was rejected, emphasizing that online education falls under commercial training. The judgment clarified the taxable activity of commercial training centers and dismissed the appeal, stating that statutory provisions do not differentiate between educational institutions and training centers for tax purposes. The analysis highlighted the legislative authority to define taxable activities, regardless of institutional titles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>