<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 152 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2683</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, remanding the matter to the Commissioner for the appellants to redeem the confiscated goods under Section 125 of the Customs Act. The Tribunal stressed the need for a fair and just exercise of discretion by the adjudicating authority in determining the fine and penalty, without a fixed formula.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 152 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2683</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, remanding the matter to the Commissioner for the appellants to redeem the confiscated goods under Section 125 of the Customs Act. The Tribunal stressed the need for a fair and just exercise of discretion by the adjudicating authority in determining the fine and penalty, without a fixed formula.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>