https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325334 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the duty demand and penalties imposed on the Appellant and the Authorised Signatory, citing insufficient evidence of clandestine manufacturing and clearance of goods. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete proof beyond theoretical calculations, highlighting the lack of physical stock verification and reliance on statutory records as insufficient grounds for the demand. The judgment underscored the importance of adherence to legal precedents and proper verification procedures in cases involving allegations of clandestine activities to uphold principles of natural justice. en-us Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:05:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325334 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the duty demand and penalties imposed on the Appellant and the Authorised Signatory, citing insufficient evidence of clandestine manufacturing and clearance of goods. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete proof beyond theoretical calculations, highlighting the lack of physical stock verification and reliance on statutory records as insufficient grounds for the demand. The judgment underscored the importance of adherence to legal precedents and proper verification procedures in cases involving allegations of clandestine activities to uphold principles of natural justice. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325334