<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 511 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported artificial fur linings under Chapter Heading 59.07, based on the length of flock fibers and HSN Explanatory Notes. Expert opinions were disregarded due to lack of cross-examination. Test reports were deemed applicable to all bills of entry due to uniformity of goods. The burden of proof was held to be met by the Revenue, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 511 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported artificial fur linings under Chapter Heading 59.07, based on the length of flock fibers and HSN Explanatory Notes. Expert opinions were disregarded due to lack of cross-examination. Test reports were deemed applicable to all bills of entry due to uniformity of goods. The burden of proof was held to be met by the Revenue, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>