https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2680 The Tribunal set aside the order of confiscation and redemption fine, ruling that lack of proper accounting alone cannot prove clandestine removal without sufficient evidence. The Appellant had paid duty on finished goods and raw materials before the notice, making additional duty payment unnecessary. The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the importance of proper documentation and circumstantial evidence in determining liability for irregularities. en-us Thu, 24 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2680 The Tribunal set aside the order of confiscation and redemption fine, ruling that lack of proper accounting alone cannot prove clandestine removal without sufficient evidence. The Appellant had paid duty on finished goods and raw materials before the notice, making additional duty payment unnecessary. The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the importance of proper documentation and circumstantial evidence in determining liability for irregularities. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 24 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2680