<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 237 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180110</link>
    <description>The Industrial Tribunal had jurisdiction to entertain a bonus dispute referred under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 was held to regulate profit-based bonus and incidental matters, but it did not extinguish independent claims for customary bonus or bonus as a condition of service; the pleadings and reference showed that the claim rested on custom and long-standing service conditions rather than profits. The earlier arbitral award did not operate as res judicata because it concerned a different dispute and a different basis of claim. The preliminary objections failed, and the matter was remitted for adjudication on the merits of the bonus claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:01:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 237 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180110</link>
      <description>The Industrial Tribunal had jurisdiction to entertain a bonus dispute referred under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 was held to regulate profit-based bonus and incidental matters, but it did not extinguish independent claims for customary bonus or bonus as a condition of service; the pleadings and reference showed that the claim rested on custom and long-standing service conditions rather than profits. The earlier arbitral award did not operate as res judicata because it concerned a different dispute and a different basis of claim. The preliminary objections failed, and the matter was remitted for adjudication on the merits of the bonus claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>