<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1115 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180109</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by ITAT, Mumbai, in a case concerning the disallowance of interest expenses under section 36(1)(iii) on advances to a sister concern. The court ruled that no disallowance was warranted as the assessee had sufficient own funds to cover the interest-free loans given, referencing precedents. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 2,55,585 towards interest expenses was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:56:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1115 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180109</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by ITAT, Mumbai, in a case concerning the disallowance of interest expenses under section 36(1)(iii) on advances to a sister concern. The court ruled that no disallowance was warranted as the assessee had sufficient own funds to cover the interest-free loans given, referencing precedents. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 2,55,585 towards interest expenses was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>