<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 1002 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180099</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling in favor of the revenue. The disallowance of depreciation on a boiler shared with sister concerns was upheld under Section 38(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the boiler was not exclusively used for business by the assessee. The Court distinguished previous decisions involving exclusive business use and dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:25:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 1002 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180099</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling in favor of the revenue. The disallowance of depreciation on a boiler shared with sister concerns was upheld under Section 38(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the boiler was not exclusively used for business by the assessee. The Court distinguished previous decisions involving exclusive business use and dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>