<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1118 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180090</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the IT Act. The AO was directed to delete the addition of Rs. 1,60,69,350. However, the disallowance of depreciation on assets costing below Rs. 5,000 was not pursued and therefore rejected. Grounds 7 and 8, being general in nature, were not addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2023 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1118 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180090</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the IT Act. The AO was directed to delete the addition of Rs. 1,60,69,350. However, the disallowance of depreciation on assets costing below Rs. 5,000 was not pursued and therefore rejected. Grounds 7 and 8, being general in nature, were not addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>