<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1104 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180088</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore in 2013 due to the lack of statutory provisions for review. The appellant was instructed to deposit the required amount within four weeks and confirm compliance by a specified date, with the warning that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:05:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1104 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180088</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore in 2013 due to the lack of statutory provisions for review. The appellant was instructed to deposit the required amount within four weeks and confirm compliance by a specified date, with the warning that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>