<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Clarification on MRP-based valuation: Retail price requirement linked to product, not packaging; penalties for non-conformance.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28002</link>
    <description>MRP based valuation - removal of goods without packing - It is not the packaging that determines the applicability of mandate of affixing the &#039;retail sale price&#039; but the product itself. Consequences of non-conforming packaging are not escapement from the mandate but the enforcement of penal detriment - appellant is eligible for the abatement - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:01:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:01:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Clarification on MRP-based valuation: Retail price requirement linked to product, not packaging; penalties for non-conformance.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28002</link>
      <description>MRP based valuation - removal of goods without packing - It is not the packaging that determines the applicability of mandate of affixing the &#039;retail sale price&#039; but the product itself. Consequences of non-conforming packaging are not escapement from the mandate but the enforcement of penal detriment - appellant is eligible for the abatement - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:01:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>