https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180083 Where rent receipts were produced, admitted in evidence, and bore the plaintiff's admitted signatures on the reverse, no further proof of their execution or issuance was required. Mere marking of a document as an exhibit does not by itself prove its contents, but that principle did not assist the plaintiff once the receipts and signatures were admitted. The defendant's tenancy plea, supported by the receipts and tenancy agreement, was therefore accepted, and the plaintiff's failure to amend the plaint or explain the admitted signatures weakened the trespass claim. The appellate court was entitled to reappreciate the evidence and reach a different view from the trial court. en-us Mon, 03 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jul 2024 10:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180083 Where rent receipts were produced, admitted in evidence, and bore the plaintiff's admitted signatures on the reverse, no further proof of their execution or issuance was required. Mere marking of a document as an exhibit does not by itself prove its contents, but that principle did not assist the plaintiff once the receipts and signatures were admitted. The defendant's tenancy plea, supported by the receipts and tenancy agreement, was therefore accepted, and the plaintiff's failure to amend the plaint or explain the admitted signatures weakened the trespass claim. The appellate court was entitled to reappreciate the evidence and reach a different view from the trial court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180083