<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (5) TMI 68 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180080</link>
    <description>Appeals to voters on caste grounds, when made in the candidate&#039;s presence or with the candidate&#039;s consent, were treated as corrupt practice under Section 123(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1961. The Court accepted oral evidence from witnesses and relied in part on a contemporaneous letter to corroborate the caste-based appeal and the speaker&#039;s influence within the relevant group. It also upheld the High Court&#039;s findings on witness credibility and found no basis to disturb them. Once caste-based solicitation of votes was established, the ingredients of corrupt practice were satisfied, and the separate undue influence issue did not require decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:30:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (5) TMI 68 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180080</link>
      <description>Appeals to voters on caste grounds, when made in the candidate&#039;s presence or with the candidate&#039;s consent, were treated as corrupt practice under Section 123(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1961. The Court accepted oral evidence from witnesses and relied in part on a contemporaneous letter to corroborate the caste-based appeal and the speaker&#039;s influence within the relevant group. It also upheld the High Court&#039;s findings on witness credibility and found no basis to disturb them. Once caste-based solicitation of votes was established, the ingredients of corrupt practice were satisfied, and the separate undue influence issue did not require decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>