<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1143 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180079</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the AO and dismissed the cross-objection filed by the assessee, maintaining the treatment of rent and service charges as income from house property, disallowance under section 14A without applying Rule 8D, and disallowance of Portfolio Management Fees. The orders were pronounced on 7th November 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:54:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1143 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180079</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the AO and dismissed the cross-objection filed by the assessee, maintaining the treatment of rent and service charges as income from house property, disallowance under section 14A without applying Rule 8D, and disallowance of Portfolio Management Fees. The orders were pronounced on 7th November 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>