<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 505 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325321</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the addition under Section 68 was unjustified as the assessee had adequately demonstrated the creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of assessing all evidence presented by the assessee and conducting necessary inquiries before making additions under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:19:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 505 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325321</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the addition under Section 68 was unjustified as the assessee had adequately demonstrated the creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of assessing all evidence presented by the assessee and conducting necessary inquiries before making additions under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>