<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 504 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325320</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty of Rs. 36,07,868/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT concluded that the assessee did not conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars, referencing the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling that making an incorrect claim does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, and the decision was pronounced on 09.02.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:19:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 504 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325320</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty of Rs. 36,07,868/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT concluded that the assessee did not conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars, referencing the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling that making an incorrect claim does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, and the decision was pronounced on 09.02.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>