<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 73 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2669</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on countervailing duty paid at re-import was not to be denied merely because the assessee had also availed small-scale exemption for home clearances, where the re-imported goods were separately accounted for, stored separately, intimated to the department, and reflected in RG-23A Part I. The substantive requirement of maintaining separate accounts was treated as satisfied by contemporaneous equivalent records, and the absence of a separate physical register in the exact departmental format was only a procedural objection. A Board circular supporting simultaneous exemption for home clearances and credit on inputs used for export production also reinforced entitlement to credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 73 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2669</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on countervailing duty paid at re-import was not to be denied merely because the assessee had also availed small-scale exemption for home clearances, where the re-imported goods were separately accounted for, stored separately, intimated to the department, and reflected in RG-23A Part I. The substantive requirement of maintaining separate accounts was treated as satisfied by contemporaneous equivalent records, and the absence of a separate physical register in the exact departmental format was only a procedural objection. A Board circular supporting simultaneous exemption for home clearances and credit on inputs used for export production also reinforced entitlement to credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>