<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 469 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325285</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the appellant to be a bona fide purchaser of a luxury car imported under false pretenses. Despite the car being liable for confiscation, the Tribunal reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 3,50,000 and imposed no penalties on the appellant, as they had acquired the car in good faith after Customs clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:08:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 469 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325285</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the appellant to be a bona fide purchaser of a luxury car imported under false pretenses. Despite the car being liable for confiscation, the Tribunal reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 3,50,000 and imposed no penalties on the appellant, as they had acquired the car in good faith after Customs clearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>