<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 468 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325284</link>
    <description>Valuation based on a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate and the record was not reopened at the Revenue&#039;s instance because no show cause notice on valuation had been issued to the assessee. The attempted enhancement was rejected as it would have prejudiced a party not put to notice, and the Revenue had not shown why the accepted value was unacceptable or what the correct value should be. The objection that the appellate order was vitiated by absence of a personal hearing also failed, since the underlying procedural lapse lay with the Revenue itself. The appeal was therefore dismissed and the valuation sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 468 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325284</link>
      <description>Valuation based on a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate and the record was not reopened at the Revenue&#039;s instance because no show cause notice on valuation had been issued to the assessee. The attempted enhancement was rejected as it would have prejudiced a party not put to notice, and the Revenue had not shown why the accepted value was unacceptable or what the correct value should be. The objection that the appellate order was vitiated by absence of a personal hearing also failed, since the underlying procedural lapse lay with the Revenue itself. The appeal was therefore dismissed and the valuation sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>