https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180051 The appeals were partly allowed in a case involving cross appeals against an order by the CIT(A)-III, Hyderabad for assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07. The assessee's grievance of an addition of Rs. 14,10,565 was sustained, while the revenue's grievance was partially upheld, granting relief to the assessee at Rs. 21,56,512 out of a total addition of Rs. 35,67,077. The Tribunal directed the assessing officer to differentiate and ascertain variable expenses for deduction, remanding the issue for fresh adjudication. en-us Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:40:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180051 The appeals were partly allowed in a case involving cross appeals against an order by the CIT(A)-III, Hyderabad for assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07. The assessee's grievance of an addition of Rs. 14,10,565 was sustained, while the revenue's grievance was partially upheld, granting relief to the assessee at Rs. 21,56,512 out of a total addition of Rs. 35,67,077. The Tribunal directed the assessing officer to differentiate and ascertain variable expenses for deduction, remanding the issue for fresh adjudication. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180051