<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 167 - HIGH COURT, PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2664</link>
    <description>The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding post-clearance adjustment and unjust enrichment. The Tribunal found no unjust enrichment as the assessee did not pass on duty amount to buyers. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose. Total amount involved was Rs. 14,924.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 167 - HIGH COURT, PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2664</link>
      <description>The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding post-clearance adjustment and unjust enrichment. The Tribunal found no unjust enrichment as the assessee did not pass on duty amount to buyers. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose. Total amount involved was Rs. 14,924.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>