<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 764 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180044</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) on the Gross Profit addition and stock valuation was not sustainable. The Tribunal found that the penalty was not justified as the Gross Profit addition had been deleted in quantum proceedings and there were no provisions to penalize the inclusion of additional income based on survey findings in the return.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:43:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 764 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180044</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) on the Gross Profit addition and stock valuation was not sustainable. The Tribunal found that the penalty was not justified as the Gross Profit addition had been deleted in quantum proceedings and there were no provisions to penalize the inclusion of additional income based on survey findings in the return.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>