https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180041 The existing food safety regime under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and the earlier food adulteration laws already covered standards for additives, packaging, labelling and misleading advertisements, so no parallel regulatory mechanism was required. The real concern was implementation, and the Court treated effective enforcement as necessary to protect the constitutional right to safe food and public health. It therefore directed the food safety authorities and their State and Union Territory counterparts to conduct periodic inspections and monitoring of major fruits and vegetable markets to ensure compliance with statutory standards. en-us Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180041 The existing food safety regime under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and the earlier food adulteration laws already covered standards for additives, packaging, labelling and misleading advertisements, so no parallel regulatory mechanism was required. The real concern was implementation, and the Court treated effective enforcement as necessary to protect the constitutional right to safe food and public health. It therefore directed the food safety authorities and their State and Union Territory counterparts to conduct periodic inspections and monitoring of major fruits and vegetable markets to ensure compliance with statutory standards. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180041