<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1393 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180039</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to grant exemption under section 10(10C) of the Act was reasonable and in line with the law. The initiation of proceedings under section 263 was deemed unjustified as the Assessing Officer had appropriately considered relevant factors before allowing the exemption. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the Learned CIT, ruling in favor of the assessee based on consistency with a prior decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:22:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1393 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180039</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to grant exemption under section 10(10C) of the Act was reasonable and in line with the law. The initiation of proceedings under section 263 was deemed unjustified as the Assessing Officer had appropriately considered relevant factors before allowing the exemption. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the Learned CIT, ruling in favor of the assessee based on consistency with a prior decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>