<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 462 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325278</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the charitable institutions, allowing depreciation under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act. It held that such allowance does not constitute double deduction. Additionally, the court determined that Section 11(6) applies prospectively from the assessment year 2015-16, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 462 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325278</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the charitable institutions, allowing depreciation under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act. It held that such allowance does not constitute double deduction. Additionally, the court determined that Section 11(6) applies prospectively from the assessment year 2015-16, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>