<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 451 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325267</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The additions made by the AO were either deleted or reduced based on lack of evidence or reasonable estimates. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verifiable evidence in making additions and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding unsecured loans from various banks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:57:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 451 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325267</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The additions made by the AO were either deleted or reduced based on lack of evidence or reasonable estimates. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verifiable evidence in making additions and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding unsecured loans from various banks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>