<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 450 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325266</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the loans advanced to subsidiaries were for commercial expediency and thus allowable under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The disallowance of interest amounting to Rs. 6,63,78,465 was reversed, emphasizing the business purposes behind the advances to subsidiaries. The Tribunal cited the principle of consistency in assessments and various judicial precedents supporting the assessee&#039;s claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:57:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 450 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325266</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the loans advanced to subsidiaries were for commercial expediency and thus allowable under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The disallowance of interest amounting to Rs. 6,63,78,465 was reversed, emphasizing the business purposes behind the advances to subsidiaries. The Tribunal cited the principle of consistency in assessments and various judicial precedents supporting the assessee&#039;s claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>