https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325262 The ITAT allowed all appeals regarding the addition of expenses for marriage functions and the value of precious items found during search and seizure. The Assessing Officer failed to provide concrete evidence that the expenses were borne by the assessee and not the bride's side, leading the ITAT to delete the additions. Similarly, the ITAT found the additions for the value of jewellery to be unreasonable and likely gifts, thus deleting them. en-us Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:57:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325262 The ITAT allowed all appeals regarding the addition of expenses for marriage functions and the value of precious items found during search and seizure. The Assessing Officer failed to provide concrete evidence that the expenses were borne by the assessee and not the bride's side, leading the ITAT to delete the additions. Similarly, the ITAT found the additions for the value of jewellery to be unreasonable and likely gifts, thus deleting them. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325262