<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 444 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325260</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition made under section 145A of the Income Tax Act, stating that the adjustment made by the assessee regarding excise duty in the closing stock was in compliance with the law. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:57:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 444 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325260</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition made under section 145A of the Income Tax Act, stating that the adjustment made by the assessee regarding excise duty in the closing stock was in compliance with the law. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>