<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 424 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325240</link>
    <description>The Gujarat HC permitted implementation of a one time settlement by directing release of the crystallised dues from sale proceeds already lying with the Registry. It held that the settled amount could be paid to the bank by cheque from the deposited funds, while the balance was to remain invested. The arrangement was confined to the amount agreed under the settlement, and the matter was left pending for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 424 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325240</link>
      <description>The Gujarat HC permitted implementation of a one time settlement by directing release of the crystallised dues from sale proceeds already lying with the Registry. It held that the settled amount could be paid to the bank by cheque from the deposited funds, while the balance was to remain invested. The arrangement was confined to the amount agreed under the settlement, and the matter was left pending for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>