<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1196 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180017</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the matter back to the AO for the appellant to obtain a completion certificate clearly stating the project&#039;s completion date. The Tribunal emphasized that the completion date mentioned in the certificate from Local Authorities is crucial for claiming deduction u/s 80-IB, rather than the physical issuance date of the certificate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1196 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180017</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the matter back to the AO for the appellant to obtain a completion certificate clearly stating the project&#039;s completion date. The Tribunal emphasized that the completion date mentioned in the certificate from Local Authorities is crucial for claiming deduction u/s 80-IB, rather than the physical issuance date of the certificate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>