<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 387 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179983</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the garden expenses as deductible under section 37(1) of the IT Act, 1961. The Court held that the expenses were wholly and exclusively for business purposes, not resulting in any gain or asset appreciation, and therefore, should be treated as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to disallow the expenditure was deemed erroneous, and the Court sided with the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:15:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 387 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179983</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the garden expenses as deductible under section 37(1) of the IT Act, 1961. The Court held that the expenses were wholly and exclusively for business purposes, not resulting in any gain or asset appreciation, and therefore, should be treated as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to disallow the expenditure was deemed erroneous, and the Court sided with the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>