<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (8) TMI 87 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179979</link>
    <description>Stowing expenditure in coal mining was treated as revenue expenditure because it was incurred as an operational step to make extraction feasible in the relevant year and as part of the profit-earning process. Applying ordinary commercial principles, the court held that the outgoing was dictated by business necessity and expediency and was not directed to bringing into existence an asset or enduring advantage. The incidental fact that stowing may have enabled continued extraction for some years did not change its true character. The expenditure was therefore deductible under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:32:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (8) TMI 87 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179979</link>
      <description>Stowing expenditure in coal mining was treated as revenue expenditure because it was incurred as an operational step to make extraction feasible in the relevant year and as part of the profit-earning process. Applying ordinary commercial principles, the court held that the outgoing was dictated by business necessity and expediency and was not directed to bringing into existence an asset or enduring advantage. The incidental fact that stowing may have enabled continued extraction for some years did not change its true character. The expenditure was therefore deductible under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>