https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325228 The appeal against the addition of Rs. 4,85,000 for the Asstt.Year 2011-12 was dismissed as the appellant failed to provide adequate evidence to substantiate the claimed expenditure. Both the Assessing Officer (AO) and the CIT(A) found the lack of documentation regarding the services provided by sub-agents, essential for justifying the expenses. The judgment emphasized the importance of maintaining proper records and supporting expenses with relevant documentation. en-us Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:14:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325228 The appeal against the addition of Rs. 4,85,000 for the Asstt.Year 2011-12 was dismissed as the appellant failed to provide adequate evidence to substantiate the claimed expenditure. Both the Assessing Officer (AO) and the CIT(A) found the lack of documentation regarding the services provided by sub-agents, essential for justifying the expenses. The judgment emphasized the importance of maintaining proper records and supporting expenses with relevant documentation. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325228