<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 391 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325207</link>
    <description>The court set aside the tribunal&#039;s order and directed the restoration of the matter for further consideration, emphasizing the need for expeditious resolution. This decision was reached after the second respondent did not contest the submissions made by the appellant&#039;s counsel. No costs were awarded, and the connected matter was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:11:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 391 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325207</link>
      <description>The court set aside the tribunal&#039;s order and directed the restoration of the matter for further consideration, emphasizing the need for expeditious resolution. This decision was reached after the second respondent did not contest the submissions made by the appellant&#039;s counsel. No costs were awarded, and the connected matter was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>