<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 389 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325205</link>
    <description>The High Court expressed dissatisfaction with the Department of Revenue&#039;s lack of compliance with court orders to establish a permanent Bench of CESTAT at Allahabad. The Court criticized the delaying tactics and contemptuous behavior, directing the Secretary of the Department of Revenue to explain the obstacles. The Ministry&#039;s temporary allocation of a building was deemed insufficient progress, considering the decision made in 2013. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad, was tasked with ensuring the handover of the allocated building to the Tribunal. All relevant officers were required to appear and submit personal affidavits for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:10:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 389 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325205</link>
      <description>The High Court expressed dissatisfaction with the Department of Revenue&#039;s lack of compliance with court orders to establish a permanent Bench of CESTAT at Allahabad. The Court criticized the delaying tactics and contemptuous behavior, directing the Secretary of the Department of Revenue to explain the obstacles. The Ministry&#039;s temporary allocation of a building was deemed insufficient progress, considering the decision made in 2013. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad, was tasked with ensuring the handover of the allocated building to the Tribunal. All relevant officers were required to appear and submit personal affidavits for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>