<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 130 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2644</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) in a case concerning the confirmation of duty demand and penalty on a respondent for paying duty on exempted final products. The Tribunal found that the respondent had the option to avail the exemption or pay duty, as established by judicial precedents and the relevant amendment to Section 5A, which was not retroactively applicable to the period in question. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was rejected, affirming the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 130 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2644</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) in a case concerning the confirmation of duty demand and penalty on a respondent for paying duty on exempted final products. The Tribunal found that the respondent had the option to avail the exemption or pay duty, as established by judicial precedents and the relevant amendment to Section 5A, which was not retroactively applicable to the period in question. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was rejected, affirming the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>